Free Samples
BUSI 2301 Business Law
.cms-body-content table{width:100%!important;} #subhidecontent{ position: relative;
overflow-x: auto;
width: 100%;}
BUSI 2301 Business Law
0 Download8 Pages / 1,963 Words
Course Code: BUSI 2301
University: Panola College
MyAssignmentHelp.com is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university
Country: United States
Question:
ASIC v Adler [2002] NSWSC 171 was one of the most significant cases in recent Australian law. You are to present an essay/report that includes the following:
What was the inappropriate behaviour displayed by Adler as an officer of HIH and other companies he managed and controlled?How did Adler’s actions contravene Australian law, in particular the Corporations Act? Please discuss the different areas of company law that were breached.What punishment did Adler suffer as a result of his conviction?What lessons does this case indicate for those who manage an Australian company?Make any interesting observations you believe are appropriate regarding this case, eg what have you learnt from your reading and research?
Answer:
Introduction
The case given for this report is ASIC v Adler [2002] NSWSC 171 is one of the important cases in the area of director duties and breaches thereof. Under Corporations Act, 2001 (Cth), many of the duties are mentioned that are required to be followed by officers and directors of a company incorporated in Australia. When any of the director or officer of an Australian company, breaches the provisions of Corporations Act 2001 then it becomes an issue itself and leads out further proceedings. In this case, director and officers of the company done some misconduct and used their position and available information with them in an inappropriate manner. In this report, the details and facts including other factors such as punishment led out by the court and learning and lesson came out from the case are mentioned.
In the subjective case, a person named Rodney Adler was a substantial shareholder and director (non-executive) of a company named HIH. HIH was a holding company of another company named Casualty and General Insurance Co Ltd (HIHC). HIHC granted a loan worth $10 million to Pacific Eagle Equity (PEE). This was an undocumented and unsecured loan. Adler also owned another company that was Pacific Eagle Equity. The said loan was granted and provided to PEE without the information and knowledge of other directors of HIH. It means only Adler was aware with the same as he was a director (non-executive) of HIH. After the said loan, PEE became a trustee of the Australian Equities Unit Trust (AEUT) (Plessis, Hargovan & Bagaric, 2010). AEUT has issued the units to HIHC at the value of $10 million; Nevertheless the overall value of the trust was less than $10 million. In addition to this, the trust involved in the case i.e. AEUT was also controlled by Adler because the only shareholder of the trust was Adler and his family members (Allens, 2018).
PEE used the received fund out of the subjective loan in an unethical manner. This company purchased the shares of HIH, worth $4 million. The only intention behind such purchase of shares was to make a false impression of the brand value of HIH. Adler wanted to show the rest of the investors of the market that HIH is doing well in it is business and shares of this company are in demand. The logic behind such intention was to prevent the price of the shares by falling down. Further, after such purchase, Adler sold out these shares at a loss of $2 million.
In addition to the above transaction, PEE spent $4 million in the purchase of shares of unlisted companies from Adler Corporations. By investing in these shares, Adler Corporation suffered from a heavy loss. It means these shares were not profitable at all. The rest of the amount out of loan i.e. $2 million was lent out to Adler. It was an unsecured loan, which was again undocumented.
Breach of the provisions of Corporations Act, 2001
In the aforesaid transactions, Adler was the person who had an interest in all the companies. He was a non-executive director of HIH and was a shareholder of HIH and PEE. In addition to this, he was also the owner of Adler Corporation and AEUT. Being a non-executive director of the company he was required to fulfill all the duties mentioned under Corporations Act, 2001 (the act). Under this act, some obligations are there for the directors and officers of the company, which they need to follow in the course of the performance of their duty.
Section 180 of Corporations Act 2001 demands, that every officer and director of the company must follow his/her duty with proper care and diligence. After reviewing the facts of the studied case, it can be stated that Adler did not perform his duty with due care. He was involved in many of the transactions that have no base. Further subsection 2 of section 180 of Corporations Act 2001 says that every director and officer of a company must use his/her best judgment while taking the decisions on behalf of the company (Austlii, 2018). Adler also breached the provisions of this subsection by doing dealing with the shares of HIH in an unethical manner. Further, he has purchased the shares of the unlisted company, which were in a financial difficulty. It can be seen that by doing so Adler did not take any reasonable care in respect of HIH.
Section 181(1) of Corporations act requires every director and officer of a company to act in the best interest of the company (Australia, 2011). Further section 181 (2) states that every such people need to act for a proper purpose. Both of these subsections of section 181 are closely connected to each other. An action cannot be considered in the best interest of the company if the same does not carry a reasonable purpose. In this case, the transaction Adler did was for his best interest but no for the company. He purchased HIH shares because he wanted to uplift the prices of shares of this company for his personal gain. Being a non-executive director, it was his duty to perform for the interest of the company but not in his personal interest.
Further, Section 182 of the act states that the office of director and office is a strong position. These people take decisions on behalf of the company and the decisions bind on the company. In such a situation, it becomes the duty of such people to not misuse of their positions. Nevertheless, in the given case, the person named Adler misused his position (Australian Government, 2018). He took adverse advantage of his position by requesting a loan worth $10 Million from HIHC. It was an unsecured loan, which was a complete danger for HIHC. Further, as HIHC was a subsidiary company, such unsecured loan could be a danger for HIH too. As Adler was the non-executive director of HIH, it was his responsibility to consider the impact of the subjective loan on HIH as well. However, he did not do so. Hence, it is clear that Adler breached his duties under section 182 of Corporations Act 2001.
In addition to section 180, 181 and 182, section 183 is also a significant section of Corporations Act 2001. This section says that a person who is in the position of a director or an officer of a company must not use the available information improperly in order to take personal benefits (Queensland Govrenment, 2018).
After a study of the provisions of section 180 to 183 of corporations acts 2001, that provides general duties of a director, this can be stated that Adler breach almost every duty which was required to be fulfilled by him.
Now moving from general duties of directors and officers under Corporations Act 2001, section 184 lay out the criminal penalties on a director who breaches their obligation under any of the sections from 180 to 183. Section 184 states that if a director of the company acts dishonestly then he /she can be held liable for the criminal offenses and can be sentenced with an imprisonment of maximum 5 years or/and a find worth $200000 (Legal Services Commission of South Australia, 2018).
Section 260A of the act states that a company can provide financial assistance to a person who is going to purchase shares in the company or in the holding company (Dundas Lawyers, 2014). While providing such assistance, the company needs to be sure that such advice is not conflicted with the interest of the company or that person. Here, the company refers to the people who act on behalf of the company. In this case, Adler did many transactions that were not in the interest of any of the companies in which he had a direct or an indirect interest. HIHC provided an unsecured loan to PEE. PEE purchased shares of unlisted companies, which was a complete loss as the financial conditions of these companies were not good. All such transactions prove that a reasonable advice was not granted by Adler to these companies where it was his liabilities to do so because the ultimate control of these companies was with Adler only. Therefore, in conjunction to director duties, Adler also breached the provisions of Section 260A.
The decision of the court
In the decision of this case, the court held that Adler being the non-executive directors of HIHC, breached his duties under section 180, 281, 182 and 183 of Corporations Act 2001 (Briefs of Cases, 2018). Further, penalties have also been levied on Adler. It was held, that he is liable to pay the compensation for damages suffered to victim parties under section 1317H of the act in addition to pecuniary penalty order under section 1317G that is a penalty of amount maximum $200000. In addition to these monetary penalties, he has also been disqualified by managing a company under section 206C of the act (Jade, 2018).
Lessons from the case
This is a very significant case in the area of director duties. As given in the decision of the case, now the people who are managing a company in Australia are being more responsible. They know their duties well. This was related to a person who has a common interest in many of the companies and therefore court held him liable to take unfair advantage of such common interest. Further, it has been noted that after this case, directors of companies became more conscious with respect to the loan and investments disbursement in group companies. Law is there for everyone but everyone does not take it seriously until unless some adverse results come out to them. For instance, in this case, Adler and other directors of HIHC had to pay penalties and they might know that how seriously they were required to take care of the rules, regulations and provisions of the Corporations Act, 2001. This act is only applicable to Australian companies and therefore is a lesson for all the directors of every Australian company. In observation, this has also noted that in addition to section 180-183 of the act, directors also owe their duties in other sections and hence they are required to comply with Corporations Act, 2001 but not the sections related to director duties.
Conclusion
In conclusion, of this report, this is to be stated that the duties of directors are an important area of the Corporations Act, 2001. The studied case i.e. ASIC V Adler is important case related to this area of study, which provides a lesson to the directors of rest of the companies in the nation that they must comply with the provisions of Corporations Act 2001, otherwise they can be held liable for penalties.
References
Allens. (2018). Cases. Retrieved From: https://www.allens.com.au/pubs/itm/jul02/cases.htms
ASIC v Adler [2002] NSWSC 171
Austlii. (2018). Corporations Act 2001 – Sect 180. Retrieved From: https://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/ca2001172/s180.html
Australia. (2011). Australian Corporations & Securities Legislation 2011: Corporations Act 2001, ASIC Act 2001, related regulations. Australia: CCH Australia Limited.
Australian Government. (2018). Corporations Act 2001. Retrieved From: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2018C00275
Briefs of Cases. (2018). ASIC v Adler (2002) 41 ACSR 72; [2002] NSWC 171 New South Wales Supreme Court. Retrieved From: https://helpcasebriefs.blogspot.com/2014/03/ASIC-v-Adler-2002-.html
Corporations Act, 2001 (Cth)
Dundas Lawyers. (2014). Do I need financial assistance whitewash? Retrieved From: https://www.dundaslawyers.com.au/do-i-need-financial-assistance-whitewash/
Jade. (2018). Adler & Anor v ASIC. Retrieved From: https://jade.io/article/235283
Legal Services Commission of South Australia, 2018). General Duties of Directors – Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). Retrieved From: https://www.lawhandbook.sa.gov.au/ch05s04s02.php
Plessis, J., J., D., Hargovan, A., & Bagaric, M. (2010). Principles of Contemporary Corporate Governance (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press:
Queensland Government. (2018). 7.3 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (the Corporations Act). Retrieved From: https://www.premiers.qld.gov.au/publications/categories/policies-and-codes/handbooks/welcome-aboard/member-duties/corp-act-2001-c.aspx
Free Membership to World’s Largest Sample Bank
To View this & another 50000+ free samples. Please put
your valid email id.
Yes, alert me for offers and important updates
Submit
Download Sample Now
Earn back the money you have spent on the downloaded sample by uploading a unique assignment/study material/research material you have. After we assess the authenticity of the uploaded content, you will get 100% money back in your wallet within 7 days.
UploadUnique Document
DocumentUnder Evaluation
Get Moneyinto Your Wallet
Total 8 pages
PAY 5 USD TO DOWNLOAD
*The content must not be available online or in our existing Database to qualify as
unique.
Cite This Work
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
APA
MLA
Harvard
OSCOLA
Vancouver
My Assignment Help. (2021). Business Law. Retrieved from https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/busi-2301-business-law/principles-of-contemporary-corporate-governance.html.
“Business Law.” My Assignment Help, 2021, https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/busi-2301-business-law/principles-of-contemporary-corporate-governance.html.
My Assignment Help (2021) Business Law [Online]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/busi-2301-business-law/principles-of-contemporary-corporate-governance.html[Accessed 18 December 2021].
My Assignment Help. ‘Business Law’ (My Assignment Help, 2021)
My Assignment Help. Business Law [Internet]. My Assignment Help. 2021 [cited 18 December 2021]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/busi-2301-business-law/principles-of-contemporary-corporate-governance.html.
×
.close{position: absolute;right: 5px;z-index: 999;opacity: 1;color: #ff8b00;}
×
Thank you for your interest
The respective sample has been mail to your register email id
×
CONGRATS!
$20 Credited
successfully in your wallet.
* $5 to be used on order value more than $50. Valid for
only 1
month.
Account created successfully!
We have sent login details on your registered email.
User:
Password:
MyAssignmenthelp.com is the perfect solution to render quality solution for all sort of academic issues. We have hired professionals from different fields of study to provide assistance with different subjects. We successfully have provided different types of assignment solutions on 100+ subjects. We have hired industry experts to deliver nursing assignment, hr assignment and finance assignment help. To offer quality content with IT assignments, we have hired IT professionals to render programming language assignment help and IT assignment help for other types of IT assignments as well.
Latest Management Samples
div#loaddata .card img {max-width: 100%;
}
MPM755 Building Success In Commerce
Download :
0 | Pages :
9
Course Code: MPM755
University: Deakin University
MyAssignmentHelp.com is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university
Country: Australia
Answers:
Introduction
The process of developing a successful business entity requires a multidimensional analysis of several factors that relate to the internal and external environment in commerce. The areas covered in this current unit are essential in transforming the business perspective regarding the key commerce factors such as ethics, technology, culture, entrepreneurship, leadership, culture, and globalization (Nzelibe, 1996; Barza, 2…
Read
More
SNM660 Evidence Based Practice
Download :
0 | Pages :
8
Course Code: SNM660
University: The University Of Sheffield
MyAssignmentHelp.com is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university
Country: United Kingdom
Answers:
Critical reflection on the objective, design, methodology and outcome of the research undertaken Assessment-I
Smoking and tobacco addiction is one of the few among the most basic general restorative issues, particularly to developed nations such as the UK. It has been represented that among all risk segments smoking is the fourth driving purpose behind infections and other several ailments like asthma, breathing and problems in the l…
Read
More
Tags:
Australia Maidstone Management Business management with marketing University of New South Wales Masters in Business Administration
BSBHRM513 Manage Workforce Planning
Download :
0 | Pages :
20
Course Code: BSBHRM513
University: Tafe NSW
MyAssignmentHelp.com is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university
Country: Australia
Answer:
Task 1
1.0 Data on staff turnover and demographics
That includes the staffing information of JKL industries for the fiscal year of 2014-15, it can be said that the company is having problems related to employee turnover. For the role of Senior Manager in Sydney, the organization needs 4 managers; however, one manager is exiting. It will make one empty position which might hurt the decision making process. On the other hand, In Brisba…
Read
More
MKT2031 Issues In Small Business And Entrepreneurship
Download :
0 | Pages :
5
Course Code: MKT2031
University: University Of Northampton
MyAssignmentHelp.com is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university
Country: United Kingdom
Answer:
Entrepreneurial ventures
Entrepreneurship is the capacity and willingness to develop, manage, and put in order operations of any business venture with an intention to make profits despite the risks that may be involved in such venture. Small and large businesses have a vital role to play in the overall performance of the economy. It is, therefore, necessary to consider the difference between entrepreneurial ventures, individual, and c…
Read
More
Tags:
Turkey Istanbul Management University of Employee Masters in Business Administration
MN506 System Management
Download :
0 | Pages :
7
Course Code: MN506
University: Melbourne Institute Of Technology
MyAssignmentHelp.com is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university
Country: Australia
Answer:
Introduction
An operating system (OS) is defined as a system software that is installed in the systems for the management of the hardware along with the other software resources. Every computer system and mobile device requires an operating system for functioning and execution of operations. There is a great use of mobile devices such as tablets and Smartphones that has increased. One of the widely used and implemented operating syste…
Read
More
Tags:
Australia Cheltenham Computer Science Litigation and Dispute Management University of New South Wales Information Technology
Next