Free Samples
LAW 1507 Tort Law
.cms-body-content table{width:100%!important;} #subhidecontent{ position: relative;
overflow-x: auto;
width: 100%;}
LAW 1507 Tort Law
0 Download3 Pages / 507 Words
Course Code: LAW 1507
University: The University Of Adelaide
MyAssignmentHelp.com is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university
Country: Australia
Question:
In this unit, you will select a case law pertaining to the topic of tort law.
Each case law analysis allows you to express yourself as clearly and fully as possible in dissecting a court decision. The purpose of the assignment is two-fold:To give you the opportunity to read a real court decision.
To challenge you to think about how you would have decided the case. In your case law analyses, you must be able to navigate the court’s decision and summarize it; you are not expected to act as a judge or an advocate.
Using your selected court decision, prepare an analysis that responds to the following:Articulates the importance, context, purpose, and relevance of law in a business environment:Identify the parties who are before the court.Provide a brief background to problem. Summarize the facts in no more than 2–3 paragraphs.Identify what is the specific disagreement between the parties.Explain the ruling of the court in no more than 1–2 paragraphs.Evaluates key judicial concepts that influence the decisions related to business:Was there a dissenting opinion? If so, explain why some of the judges or justices disagreed with the majority in the decision.Finally, do you agree with the court’s decision? Why or why not?You may choose any court case, either state or federal, as the basis for your case law analysis; however, the case should be applicable to the assignment topic. The recommended Web sites for researching and locating a case are listed in the Resources area.Your analysis should be no more than two pages, double-spaced. References and citations are to adhere to APA formatting and style guidelines. Prior to submitting your assignment, be sure to review the scoring guide to ensure you have met all of the grading criteria.
Answer:
Introduction:
In this case, Lieback dropped McDonald’s cup of coffee in her lap. It caused third degree burn to her legs (Howells, & Weatherill, 2017). Liebeck made a request to McDonald’s restaurant to pay medical expenses but McDonald’s refused to pay. On the refusal, Liebeck filed a lawsuit in court. During the proceedings, it was found that there were number of grievances against McDonalds that coffee had caused burns to customers.
Though, temperature of coffee is specified in restaurant’s operational manual. The panel of judges granted Liebeck compensatory damages of $200000 and punitive charges of $ 2.7 million. McDonalds tried to settle the matter with Liebeck but Liebeck did not agree to settle. In due course, judge reduced the amount by $ 640000 and at last case was appealed by McDonalds.
Specific Disagreement
In the given case, there was specific disagreement between the parties. Liebeck suspected that coffee was prepared badly due to heat and served in cup which was designed defectively. Furthermore Liebeck said that cup had no warning regarding caution. McDonalds denied these facts in some of its pleading that potable coffee is of hot nature and all other restaurant serve excessively hot coffee. Further McDonalds argued that every year billion cups of coffee have been consumed and no incident happened in this regard. And Liebeck’s injuries were severe. Her third degree burns required skin graft (Shelley, 2017). Liebeck requested McDonalds to pay her medical expenses but it was denied by McDonalds.
Ruling of court
After the hearings, Court found Liebeck sympathetic and McDonalds inadequately concerned. Jury awarded plaintiff $ 200,000 as compensatory damages to cover medical expenses and $ 2.7 million in punitive damages. Further court reduced the amount by $ 640,000. McDonalds made appeal but plaintiff and defendant made settlement for a confidential amount before deciding appeal.
Existence of Dissenting Opinion
In the above discussed case, there was no dissenting opinion. Because all the judges of panel had same opinion on this case after hearing of arguments, reviewing documents and evidences. They did not disagree with each other on the final decision.
Review of court’s decision
In the given case, court had given right decision because when this case was present to the court, the panel of judges found that Stella Liebeck had suffered third degree burns and got skin graft. Liebeck was hospitalized for 8 days and medical expenses were claimed by her. But McDonalds denied paying. After determining these facts court found Liebeck sympathetic and awarded her compensative damages of $ 200000 and the punitive damages of $ 2.7 million. Later this amount was reduced by $ 640000 because judges found that Liebeck was 20% liable for her injury because of not aware about the warning on the cup of coffee and McDonald was 80% liable for this all incident. As court heard arguments and considered facts of both the party, it arrived at correct decision.
Reference
Howells, G., & Weatherill, S. (2017). Consumer Protection Law. California: Routledge.
Shelley, J. (2017). Food as a Dangerous Product: The Promise of Private Law for Public Health (Doctoral dissertation). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Free Membership to World’s Largest Sample Bank
To View this & another 50000+ free samples. Please put
your valid email id.
Yes, alert me for offers and important updates
Submit
Download Sample Now
Earn back the money you have spent on the downloaded sample by uploading a unique assignment/study material/research material you have. After we assess the authenticity of the uploaded content, you will get 100% money back in your wallet within 7 days.
UploadUnique Document
DocumentUnder Evaluation
Get Moneyinto Your Wallet
Total 3 pages
PAY 2 USD TO DOWNLOAD
*The content must not be available online or in our existing Database to qualify as
unique.
Cite This Work
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
APA
MLA
Harvard
OSCOLA
Vancouver
My Assignment Help. (2020). Tort Law. Retrieved from https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/law-1507-tort-law/compensatory-damages.html.
“Tort Law.” My Assignment Help, 2020, https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/law-1507-tort-law/compensatory-damages.html.
My Assignment Help (2020) Tort Law [Online]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/law-1507-tort-law/compensatory-damages.html[Accessed 19 December 2021].
My Assignment Help. ‘Tort Law’ (My Assignment Help, 2020)
My Assignment Help. Tort Law [Internet]. My Assignment Help. 2020 [cited 19 December 2021]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/law-1507-tort-law/compensatory-damages.html.
×
.close{position: absolute;right: 5px;z-index: 999;opacity: 1;color: #ff8b00;}
×
Thank you for your interest
The respective sample has been mail to your register email id
×
CONGRATS!
$20 Credited
successfully in your wallet.
* $5 to be used on order value more than $50. Valid for
only 1
month.
Account created successfully!
We have sent login details on your registered email.
User:
Password:
MyAssignmenthelp.com has appointed best assignment experts who are wizards of words. Our writers know every trick of crafting high quality write-ups within a short period. With years of experiences, we have become one of the most prolific assignment help services in the USA. We deliver custom-made help to students with writing different types of assignments. We guarantee total need-based and timely service, and this is why increasing numbers of students prefer to buy assignment online.
Latest Business Law Samples
div#loaddata .card img {max-width: 100%;
}
BU1112 Business Law
Download :
0 | Pages :
6
Course Code: BU1112
University: James Cook University
MyAssignmentHelp.com is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university
Country: Australia
Answer:
Part A
Issue:
Whether Stella is considered as an employee of PRX?
Rule:
The main difference between employee and independent contractor is stated below:
Employee entered into contract of service, but contractor entered into contract for services.
Employer exercise control over the employee but no control was exercised by employer on contractor. It is considered as traditional test which was developed in Zuijs v Wirth Bros(Zuijs…
Read
More
Tags:
Australia South Lake Management health finance management University of New South Wales
BSBWHS605 Develop Implement And Maintain WHS Management Systems
Download :
0 | Pages :
15
Course Code: BSBWHS605
University: Swinburne University Of Technology
MyAssignmentHelp.com is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university
Country: Australia
Answers:
Work Health and Safety Management System (WHSMS) is a collection of plans, tools, activities and processes. List 3 of these plans, tools, activities or processes and explain what they are,
The means, nitty gritty beneath, can be utilized whether the arranging procedure is straightforward or complex. They are:
Evaluating the current word related to wellbeing and security status including the ‘administration framework’ Lussier, R. N…
Read
More
Tags:
Australia Brisbane Management Work Health and Safety Management System (WHSMS University of Brisbane MBA
BUSN331 Business Law
Download :
0 | Pages :
3
Course Code: BUSN331
University: Centennial College
MyAssignmentHelp.com is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university
Country: Canada
Answers:
Introduction
In Alberta, the Residential Tenancies Act applies to all the people in this jurisdiction, who rent their space out (Alberta Queen’s Printer, 2016). Through this act, the rights and responsibilities of the landlords and tenants are brought forward (Landlord and Tenant, 2015).
Question 1
Before a tenant can move in the rented accommodation, the tenant and the landlord have to reach an agreement, with regards to the…
Read
More
Tags:
Australia Edmonton Humanities Management University of New South Wales Masters in Business Administration
LA1040 Contract Law
Download :
0 | Pages :
11
Course Code: LA1040
University: University Of London
MyAssignmentHelp.com is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university
Country: United Kingdom
Answer:
Introduction
A contract is an agreement between the parties which is enforceable legally in the courts. There are several provisions of law which governs how the terms related to the contract would operate. A contract consists of a set of provisions which are known as contractual terms. The weightage of such terms are not equal as one term may have a more significant consequence as compared to the other in relation to their brea…
Read
More
Tags:
United Kingdom London Economics Management University of London
TLAW202 Corporations Law
Download :
0 | Pages :
9
Course Code: TLAW202
University: Top Education Institute
MyAssignmentHelp.com is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university
Country: Australia
Answers:
1.
If any person wants to carry out his business in the form of a company, then, it is necessary that the registration or incorporation requirements of such country must be met. In Australia, the Corporation Act 2001 and the guidelines laid down by ASIC provides with the steps that must be accomplish in order to establish a corporate entity. (Malbon & Bishop, 2006).
A company is of great significance as it is treated as a …
Read
More
Next